/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) classroom discourse (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: classroom discourse
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt167 - : Thoms, J. (2012). Classroom Discourse in Foreign Language Classrooms: A Review of the Literature . Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 45, Iss. S1, pp. S8-S27. DOI: 10.111/j.1944-9720.2012.01 177.x. [ [90]Links ]
2
paper CO_CuadernosdeLingüísticaHispánicatxt10 - : Frances, C. (2005). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective . London, GBR: Continuum International PubUshing, 2005. E-brary, p. 19. [ [34]Links ]
3
paper CO_Íkalatxt164 - : Learning history involves learning to look to the past in a particular way. In classroom discourse, teachers interact with students bringing them into thinking, representing and communicating social world from three dimensions: time–space, causality and evidentiality (Oteíza, 2009 ). The multimodal perspective on communication considers the semiotic potential of the various resources that are intertwined in discourse to create meaning in context. This research (Fondecyt 1130684) is carried out from the multimodal approach, systemic functional linguistics and appraisal theory, to explore the semiotic options of three case studies: three teachers of history in the 1st year of Secondary School. The corpus consists of the audiovisual record of three introductory lessons within the same curriculum unit: World War ii. After a multimodal discourse analysis, findings indicate that each teacher chose different combinations of semiotic media and modes to teach the same content. Concerning disciplinary
4
paper CO_Íkalatxt162 - : Thoms, J. J. (2012). Classroom discourse in foreign language classrooms: A review of the literature . Foreign Language Annals, 45(S1), S8-S27. doi:[89]10.111 /j.1944-9720.2012.01177 [ [90]Links ]
5
paper UY_ALFALtxt2 - : [82]Cazden, Courtney. 1988. Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning . Portsmouth, Heinemann.
Evaluando al candidato classroom discourse:
4) multimodal: 3 (*)
5) semiotic: 3 (*)
classroom discourse
Lengua: eng
Frec: 96
Docs: 54
Nombre propio: 4 / 96 = 4%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.501 = (2 + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+6.59991284218713)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| classroom discourse |
: *Smit, U. (2007). ELF (English as a lingua franca) as medium of instruction–interactional repair in international hotel management education. In C. D. Puffer & U. Smit, Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 227-251). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing AG. : 15. Li, L., & Walsh, S. (2011). Seeing is believing: looking at EFL teachers' beliefs through classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 2(1), 39-57. : 2. Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis. Londres: Continuum. : 31. Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London, England: Routledge. : 36. Orland-Barak, L. & Yinon, H. (2007). When theory meets practice: What student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 957-969. : Brock, C. A. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47-59. : Buchholz, B. (2007). Refraining young learners' classroom discourse structure as a preliminary requirement for a CLIL-based ELT approach. IN DALTON-PUFFER C. & SMIT, U. (Ed.) Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang. : Buzzelli, C. A. & Johnston, B. (2001). Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education. N° 17, pp. 83-84. : Candela, A. (1998). Student power in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education. 10:139-164. : Cazden, C. (1986). Language in the classroom discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 7, 18-33. : Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. : Cazden, C.S. Classroom Discourse. The Language ofTeaching and Learning. London: Routledge y Kegan Paul, 1986. : Christie, F. (2002). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A functional perspective. Londres: Continuum. : Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2007). Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse. Peter Lang. : Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 19-37). Mahwah, nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Kayi-Aidar, H. & Miller, E. (2018). Positioning in classroom discourse studies: a state-of-the-art review, Classroom Discourse, 9(2), 79-94. [87]https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1450275 : Kumaravadivelu, B. (1999). Critical classroom discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 453-484. : Lyster, R. (1997). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81. : Markee, N. (2015). The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. : Mortimer, E. (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in classroom discourse: an example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 67-82. [DOI: 10.1080/0950069980200105] . : O’Connor, M., y Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning Academic Task and Participation Status through Revoicing: Analysis of a Classroom Discourse Strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318-335. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063k. : Ramírez, A. (1988). Analyzing speech acts. En J. Green & J. O. Harker (eds.), Multiple perspective analysis of classroom discourse (pp. 135-163). Norwood (Nj): Ablex Publishing Corporation. : Rymes, B. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. : Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press. : Tannen, D. (1996). Gender in research on language: Researching gender-related patterns in classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 341-344. : Van Sluys, K., Lewison, M., & Flint, A. (2006). Researching critical literacy: A critical study of analysis of classroom discourse. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 197-233. : Van de Craen P., Ceuleers, E., Lochtman, K., Allain, L. & Mondt, K. (2007). An interdisciplinary research approach to CLIL learning in primary schools in Brussels. En C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives in CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 48-64). Frankfurt: Lang. : Walper, K., Reed, D. y Marsden, H. (2021). Designedly incomplete elicitations: teachers’ multimodal practices to mobilise student-next action in chilean secondary EFL classrooms. Classroom Discourse. [267]https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1920997 : Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating Classroom Discourse. Abingdon, Roudedge. : Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. NY: Routledge. : Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom Discourse and Teacher Development. Edinburgh University Press. : Waring, H. Z. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(2), 201-218. : van Compernolle, R. y Smotrova, T. (2017). Gesture, meaning, and thinking-for-teaching in unplanned vocabulary explanations. Classroom Discourse, 8(3), 194-213. [262]https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1275028 |